Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 25(23)2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313322

ABSTRACT

We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. Random-effects models yielded a summary sensitivity of 82% for IgM, and 85% for IgG and total antibodies. For specificity, the pooled estimate were 98% for IgM and 99% for IgG and total antibodies. In populations with ≤ 5% of seroconverted individuals, unless the assays have perfect (i.e. 100%) specificity, the positive predictive value would be ≤ 88%. Serological tests should be used for prevalence surveys only in hard-hit areas.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Serologic Tests/standards , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests/methods , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/blood
2.
Front Immunol ; 13: 841716, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1855353

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact worldwide and has been a great challenge for the scientific community. Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are now efficiently lessening COVID-19 mortality, although finding a cure for this infection is still a priority. An unbalanced immune response and the uncontrolled release of proinflammatory cytokines are features of COVID-19 pathophysiology and contribute to disease progression and worsening. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) have gained interest in immunology, as they regulate the innate and adaptative immune response at different levels. Inhibitors of these enzymes have already proven therapeutic potential in cancer and are currently being investigated for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. We thus tested the effects of different HDAC inhibitors, with a focus on a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, on immune and epithelial cells in in vitro models that mimic cells activation after viral infection. Our data indicate that HDAC inhibitors reduce cytokines release by airway epithelial cells, monocytes and macrophages. This anti-inflammatory effect occurs together with the reduction of monocytes activation and T cell exhaustion and with an increase of T cell differentiation towards a T central memory phenotype. Moreover, HDAC inhibitors hinder IFN-I expression and downstream effects in both airway epithelial cells and immune cells, thus potentially counteracting the negative effects promoted in critical COVID-19 patients by the late or persistent IFN-I pathway activation. All these data suggest that an epigenetic therapeutic approach based on HDAC inhibitors represents a promising pharmacological treatment for severe COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cytokines/metabolism , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Histone Deacetylases/metabolism , Humans , Immunity , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0263014, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1662442

ABSTRACT

The correlation between immune responses and protection from SARS-CoV-2 infections and its duration remains unclear. We performed a sanitary surveillance at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) in Milan over a 17 months period. Pre-vaccination, in 1,493 participants, we scored 266 infections (17.8%) and 8 possible reinfections (3%). Post-vaccination, we identified 30 infections in 2,029 vaccinated individuals (1.5%). We report that the probability of infection post-vaccination is i) significantly lower compared to natural infection, ii) associated with a significantly shorter median duration of infection than that of first infection and reinfection, iii) anticorrelated with circulating antibody levels.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/blood , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Male , Mass Vaccination , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Time Factors , Young Adult
4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 367, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-660900

ABSTRACT

Background: The unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on modern society has ignited a "gold rush" for effective treatment and diagnostic strategies, with a significant diversion of economic, scientific, and human resources toward dedicated clinical research. We aimed to describe trends in this rapidly changing landscape to inform adequate resource allocation. Methods: We developed an online repository (COVID Trial Monitor) to analyze in real time the growth rate, geographical distribution, and characteristics of COVID-19 related trials. We defined structured semantic ontologies with controlled vocabularies to categorize trial interventions, study endpoints, and study designs. Analyses are publicly available at https://bioinfo.ieo.it/shiny/app/CovidCT. Results: We observe a clear prevalence of monocentric trials with highly heterogeneous endpoints and a significant disconnect between geographic distribution and disease prevalence, implying that most countries would need to recruit unrealistic percentages of their total prevalent cases to fulfill enrolment. Conclusions: This geographically and methodologically incoherent growth casts doubts on the actual feasibility of locally reaching target sample sizes and the probability of most of these trials providing reliable and transferable results. We call for the harmonization of clinical trial design criteria for COVID-19 and the increased use of larger master protocols incorporating elements of adaptive designs. COVID Trial Monitor identifies critical issues in current COVID-19-related clinical research and represents a useful resource with which researchers and policymakers can improve the quality and efficiency of related trials.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL